Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government book. Happy reading Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government Pocket Guide.

Salemi of New York University, whose father witnessed it, reported it. In the " Biscari massacre ", which consisted of two instances of mass murder, U. According to an article in Der Spiegel by Klaus Wiegrefe, many personal memoirs of Allied soldiers have been wilfully ignored by historians until now because they were at odds with the " greatest generation " mythology surrounding World War II. The Battle for Normandy , by Antony Beevor. Historian Peter Lieb has found that many U. If this view is correct, it may explain the fate of 64 German prisoners out of the captured who did not make it to the POW collecting point on Omaha Beach on the day of the landings.

In the aftermath of the Malmedy massacre , in which 80 American POWs were murdered by their German captors, a written order from the headquarters of the th U. Army Infantry Regiment, dated 21 December , stated: Army gave instructions to his troops not to take prisoners when they crossed the Rhine in Only one of them said he shot a prisoner Perhaps as many as one-third of the veterans Lundeberg has written that the beating and torture of U's survivors was a singular atrocity motivated by the interrogators' need to quickly get information on what the U.

The " Dachau massacre " involved the killing of German prisoners of war and surrendering SS soldiers at the Dachau concentration camp. In interviews with his biographer Charles Brandt, Sheeran recalled his war service with the Thunderbird Division as the time when he first developed a callousness to the taking of human life. In his interviews with Brandt, Sheeran divided such massacres into four different categories. Secret wartime files made public only in reveal that American GIs committed sexual offenses in Europe, including rapes in England, between and In , the South Korean government certified the names of dead or missing mostly women, children, and old men and 55 wounded.

It said that many other victims' names were not reported.


This episode early in the Korean War gained widespread attention when the Associated Press AP published a series of articles in that subsequently won a Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting. The Vietnam War Crimes Working Group Files is a collection of formerly secret documents compiled by Pentagon investigators in the early s, confirming that atrocities by U.

See also Winter Soldier Investigation. The My Lai Massacre was the mass murder of to unarmed citizens in South Vietnam, almost entirely civilians , most of them women and children, conducted by U. Some of the victims were raped, beaten, tortured, or maimed, and some of the bodies were found mutilated. Initially sentenced to life in prison, Calley had his sentence reduced to ten years, then was released after only three and a half years under house arrest. The incident prompted widespread outrage around the world, and reduced U. Congressmen, and received hate mail, death threats, and mutilated animals on their doorsteps.

In the aftermath of the September 11, attacks , the U. Government adopted several new measures in the classification and treatment of prisoners captured in the War on Terror, including applying the status of unlawful combatant to some prisoners, conducting extraordinary renditions , and using torture " enhanced interrogation techniques ". Human Rights Watch and others described the measures as being illegal under the Geneva Conventions.

A presidential memorandum of February 7, , authorized U. Paust, professor of law and formerly a member of the faculty of the Judge Advocate General 's School, "necessarily authorized and ordered violations of the Geneva Conventions, which are war crimes. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and others have argued that detainees should be considered " unlawful combatants " and as such not be protected by the Geneva Conventions in multiple memoranda regarding these perceived legal gray areas. Gonzales' statement that denying coverage under the Geneva Conventions "substantially reduces the threat of domestic criminal prosecution under the War Crimes Act " suggests, to some authors, an awareness by those involved in crafting policies in this area that U.

Supreme Court challenged the premise on which this argument is based in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld , in which it ruled that Common Article Three of the Geneva Conventions applies to detainees in Guantanamo Bay and that the military tribunals used to try these suspects were in violation of U. Human Rights Watch claimed in that the principle of " command responsibility " could make high-ranking officials within the Bush administration guilty of the numerous war crimes committed during the War on Terror , either with their knowledge or by persons under their control.

The Military Commissions Act of is seen by some as an amnesty law for crimes committed in the War on Terror by retroactively rewriting the War Crimes Act [88] and by abolishing habeas corpus , effectively making it impossible for detainees to challenge crimes committed against them. Shortly before the end of President Bush's second term in , newsmedia in countries other than the U. Bush had lost his head of state immunity and under international law the U. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Rape during the occupation of Japan.

Rape during the liberation of France and Rape during the occupation of Germany. No Gun Ri massacre and Sinchon massacre. The Occupation of Mexico, May July The New York Times. Archived from the original on 21 April The American Conquest of the Philippines, — Archived from the original on Empire in the Making of the Modern American State. Edited by Alfred W. McCoy and Francisco A. University of Wisconsin Press, , pp.

Information on the use of craters as sites of refuge during Spanish attacks can be found in: The Sulu Zone, The named reference bakbakan1 was invoked but never defined see the help page. Honor in the Dust: The named reference hagedornp64 was invoked but never defined see the help page. Royal Australian Air Force — Australian Airmen in the Pacific War. Crows Nest, New South Wales: Dower, , War Without Mercy , p. New York University Press. Retrieved 6 April Still, the villagers' tale of a dark, long-kept secret has refocused attention on what historians say is one of the most widely ignored crimes of the war, the widespread rape of Okinawan women by American servicemen.

The Battle of Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb. The American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa: Modern Japanese Literature from Okinawa. Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power": Weingartner, "Massacre at Biscari: Thayer, Darwin and international relations p. In Runyan, Timothy J.

  • Building the Body: 2007 - Spring?
  • .
  • God in a Brothel: An Undercover Journey into Sex Trafficking and Rescue.
  • Gone Bad;
  • The hypocrisy of the US-UK extradition act | Afghanistan | Al Jazeera.

The Battle of the Atlantic. The Hunted, — Modern Library ed. Dachau its liberation 57th Infantry Association, Felix L. Sparks, Secretary 15 June Retrieved 22 November The Journal of Military History. Retrieved 6 January Government of the Republic of Korea. Ex-GIs tell of killing Korean refugees". Detainee Deaths in U.

Archived at the Wayback Machine.

Paust, May 20, p. The fight over the Hamdan ruling heats up—as fears about its reach escalate. Archived May 12, , at the Wayback Machine. Command Responsibility for the U. Archived from the original on August 13, Retrieved April 2, Accessed 12 November Bush und Donald Rumsfeld. In the name of democracy: American war crimes in Iraq and beyond. Mark Selden; Alvin Y.

War and state terrorism: Frederick Henry Gareau State terrorism and the United States: The Prosecution of George W.


Clinton, Trump, and the ends of great power hypocrisy | USA | Al Jazeera

Falk ; Irene L. Gendzier; Robert Jay Lifton , eds. Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed Behind the war on terror: Marjorie Cohn November 9, The War Crimes Case". Rumsfeld Lawsuit Embarrasses German Authorities". Greiner, Bernd; Anne Wyburd The USA in Vietnam. The war behind me: Vietnam veterans confront the truth about U. Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam. Retrieved from " https: American war crimes War crimes committed by country. Richard, who is attempting to carry on with life "as normally as possible" and continues to attend Sheffield Hallam University, is facing trial and up to 10 years in jail in the US for offences which lawyers say are not even crimes in the UK.

Richard's mother Julia, who is relentlessly fighting day and night against the extradition, tells me there is no justification for her son to be sent to the United States, as the US would never allow this to happen to one of their citizens.

The hypocrisy of the US-UK extradition act

TVShack's server was not set up and operated from America. Why aren't they going after the sites which stored the illegal material, instead of intent to make an example out of Richard? If any British citizen appears to have committed a crime in the UK, then they should be tried in the UK and given the right to prove they are innocent under British law of the allegations made against them. Would the US allow this to happen to one of their citizens? No, they absolutely would not. They knew this Extradition Act was a one sided farce, that's why they didn't sign up to it like the UK did who rushed it through and now my son is having to pay the ultimate price for that.

Doing whatever he could though, has resulted in a chilling situation, where Britons who could not be any further removed from terror suspects, are stripped of all their human and legal rights and shipped across the Atlantic. This biased, one sided treaty is grossly unjust. If a crime is suspected to have being carried out by a UK citizen on the UK soil, why is the British government who just in case have forgotten that their first and fundamental duty is to protect its citizens allowing them to be tried in the US where they don't live, where the alleged crime didn't take place, where there are complications and difficulties in summoning witnesses to give evidence and where they are not entitled to the legal aid that they will desperately need?

HYPOCRISY: China Slams Back By Releasing Annual US Human Rights Report

Moreover, the contentious issue of plea bargains in the US makes a macabre mockery of a justice system where innocent defendants are pressurised to enter into plea negotiations. In turn, the vulnerability, rights and morality of the innocent are exploited to produce results for the US legal system, where 95 per cent of all convictions are secured with a guilty plea, most of them through plea bargaining.

Our British government can see absolutely nothing wrong with agreeing to allow the US to take our citizens on the grounds of "reasonable suspicion" that the accused is guilty. The US is not required to supply a scrap of "prima facie" evidence before a UK court to prove that a crime was committed, so with no questions asked, innocent-until-proven-guilty British citizens are stamped and sent on their way. However, on this side of the pond, the UK is required to show "probable cause" when requesting for an American to be extradited. Why isn't the British government following the US' lead of ferociously protecting their citizens?

He will not be extradited to Afghanistan, where the alleged crime took place, but will be tried in the US. That is a separate debate, but nevertheless, an example of how the US will do everything and anything they can to protect their own. Referring back to the US constitution, why then is this coalition government not making sure the rights of the British people "are not violated" and that we are "secure in our persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures?

Navigation menu

Surely, the UK is not frightened to stand up to the US, scared to risk ruining a "special relationship" between "friends"? In the same period, incoming requests were received by the UK from the US. Our government, I'm sure will point to the Scott Baker Review as proof that they have acted, but the report concluded with the ground-breaking revelation that the "treaty does not operate in an unbalanced manner".

Sir Scott Baker is wrong and seems happy to stand in solitude over his muddled and deluded declaration. Liberty has led the condemnation stating: The British public are deeply uneasy and uncomfortable with the fact that British citizens are permitted to be sent across the world under this grotesquely unfair and unbalanced treaty.

They urgently urged the British government to renegotiate the treaty - that seems to have fallen on deaf ears. In their report , they warned the government: I have no rights.

Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government
Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government
Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government
Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government
Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government
Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government
Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government

Related Hypocrisy 101: The Crimes Of the U.S. Government

Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved